• Administrator
  •  

    FORUM IS OUT!!!!

    If you are having trouble with embeds, please change your links to use forum.funkystation.org instead of the old URL.

     

NTRep!Suri's Command Suitability Assessment

wanna ask in character questions to other people's characters? wanna post from the perspective of your character? this is the place!


User avatar
kthulu278
Entrepreneur
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2026 9:28 am
Pronouns: they/them

departments

Relilikav: NTRep!Suri's Command Suitability Assessment

Post by kthulu278 »


█▄░█░░ NANOTRASEN DIRECTIVE
█░▀██▀ COMMAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT
░░░░█░ FILLED BY Relilikav, RD
////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Please answer each question in the space provided. Brevity is acceptable. Incomplete responses may require follow-up.

This self-reflection is a routine exercise designed to maintain command clarity and ensure alignment with operational
expectations.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Describe a recent moment where you felt most certain your decision was correct:

Ensuring my family lives a comfortable life. It has come with a cost, to be certain, but one that is far more than worth it.

Describe a recent moment where you questioned whether your decision was correct:

Every one. There is always room for improvement.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
When faced with competing priorities, what ultimately guides your final choice?

SOP and threat to station assets.

Is there information you have chosen not to share with your department or crew? Why?

Obviously. If it isn't relevant to their current work, then they are not informed. We've all read the CTM.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Think of a time someone challenged your authority. What did that feel like?

I will admit that it is always an annoyance, but I'm not afraid to admit when a subordinate's solution is better than mine. If not, then a short teaching moment is in order.

Think of a time someone supported your decisions without question. What did that feel like?

Efficient. I don't like wasting time explaining myself.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
What value most consistently guides your command decisions?

SOP.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Is there ever a gap between what you want to do and what you actually do? Describe:

Yes. I don't like being RD, but someone has to play the part, and I know how to do it. I'm not stupid enough to think I have a choice in the matter.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Looking ahead, what kind of leader do you want to be?

One that gets the job done.

What kind of leader does NanoTrasen need you to be?

A good little drone who makes sure all the other ones play their parts.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
All responses are logged in your permanent personnel file. Honesty in command reflection is noted and reviewed positively.

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

Last edited by kthulu278 on Sun Mar 29, 2026 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Nazariel
Assistant
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2026 6:39 pm
Pronouns: She/They
Gender:

departments

Re: NTRep!Suri's Command Suitability Assessment

Post by Nazariel »

(Document is written as being filled by Halyna Oliana, my CMO character.)


█▄░█░░ NANOTRASEN DIRECTIVE
█░▀██▀ COMMAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT
░░░░█░ FILLED BY NAME HERE
////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Please answer each question in the space provided. Brevity is acceptable. Incomplete responses may require follow-up.

This self-reflection is a routine exercise designed to maintain command clarity and ensure alignment with operational
expectations.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Describe a recent moment where you felt most certain your decision was correct:

The demotion of one of my doctors for abandoning their post. Said doctor kept being absent at the medbay when patients needed urgent care and resulted in a major slowdown of the whole department, so with the help of the present Captain, they were promptly demoted to assistant. I take pride in maintaining a functioning medical bay, so this kind of absentist behavior is absolutely not welcomed in my department.

Describe a recent moment where you questioned whether your decision was correct:

Letting a medical cyborg operate on a Head of Security. This shift's HoS got badly injured during a fire, requiering urgent surgery. Being occupied with the treatment of other victims of said fire, I let our department's cyborg perform the surgery. This was a grave mistake as the Head of Security ended up succumbing to surgical malpractice from the cyborg. I strongly believe it was my fault for not confirming the integrity of the cyborg on such an important operation.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
When faced with competing priorities, what ultimately guides your final choice?

As the Head of the medical department, the most common competing priorities is what patients need to be prioritized. I follow a basic ruling of Command and CentComm personnel taking absolute priority, then refer to the alert level for priority treatment. (Red alert means Security personnel gets priority, Yellow alert means Engineering personnel gets priority, Violet alert means the integrity of my medical staff is paramount.)

Is there information you have chosen not to share with your department or crew? Why?

Naturally, I shall never reveal corporate secrets to my team or patients. The major exception I make is if an undead outbreak were to happen. In such cases my department becomes absolutely crucial in the survival of the station, and I do believe my medical staff would be more efficient when knowing the nature of such threat.
If this situation were to happen, I will fully accept all executive consequences. I would rather face disciplinary action myself than let an entire station fall.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Think of a time someone challenged your authority. What did that feel like?

Refering to the first answer of this document, this was the biggest case of actual disrespect I have received while leading a medical team. To be perfectly honest, this makes me angry, as all kind of disrespect does. I personally have a zero tolerance policy on pure disrespect, especially when people's lives are at stake.

Think of a time someone supported your decisions without question. What did that feel like?

As a team leader, I do recognize the fact that I am here to make the decisions in the first place and such, simple decisions as "Doctor, please treat this patient ASAP." should just be followed without question. (Even if I still have the politeness of saying "Thank you." to those who follow my orders.) I do believe it is normal for my doctors to simply follow my directions.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
What value most consistently guides your command decisions?

Deeply, I just care about people's wellbeing. Seeing a fully healthy, fully functional crew does make me happy. Leading a team that makes sure this happens is what makes me proud.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Is there ever a gap between what you want to do and what you actually do? Describe:

I do not believe there is a big gap. I understand what NanoTrasen asks of me is to keep the medical team in check, in fully working condition and ultimately making sure the entire crew is healthy and in working condition. I do not believe this conflicts with my personnal goal of seeing people healthy.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Looking ahead, what kind of leader do you want to be?

As written several times, I want to be a leader my team respects and looks up to, I do not want to be held as a hero, but just as someone my team can rely on for directions, teaching and assurance.

What kind of leader does NanoTrasen need you to be?

Once again, like written earlier, It is my understanding that NanoTrasen gave me this position to assure that the medical department is fully functional in any way possible

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
All responses are logged in your permanent personnel file. Honesty in command reflection is noted and reviewed positively.

Halyna Oliana

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

I'm just a girl! But also a dragon!
I'm a girl who is a dragon! A dragon who is a girl!
A dragon girl! A girl dragon!

User avatar
protoslag
Visitor
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2026 11:16 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Gender:

Re: NTRep!Suri's Command Suitability Assessment

Post by protoslag »


█▄░█░░ NANOTRASEN DIRECTIVE
█░▀██▀ COMMAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT
░░░░█░ FILLED BY Discere Ministrare
////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Please answer each question in the space provided. Brevity is acceptable. Incomplete responses may require follow-up.

This self-reflection is a routine exercise designed to maintain command clarity and ensure alignment with operational
expectations.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Describe a recent moment where you felt most certain your decision was correct:

Firing a paramedic. They had gambled most everything they owned in a show of... I am unsure why. I won't pretend to understand the thoughts behind gambling.

Describe a recent moment where you questioned whether your decision was correct:

I handed out an item without documenting having handed it out. It wasn't that bad of a thing but it is a mistake nonetheless. Supposedly, I should be good with paperwork, but I see myself failing with smaller things.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
When faced with competing priorities, what ultimately guides your final choice?

Ideally, I will follow whichever one best suits the interests of NT. I am not particularly fond of other such things or corporations... mostly considering NanoTrasen gave me my job here. It's nice...

Is there information you have chosen not to share with your department or crew? Why?

Much information, there are some things people do not need to know about me as they do not help anyone know me better or become more chummy with me. ideally no one would know it, but NanoTrasen knows best, right?

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Think of a time someone challenged your authority. What did that feel like?

It did not feel good. I felt insulted and wondered what I had done wrong in the moment. It hurt really bad. Really bad.

Think of a time someone supported your decisions without question. What did that feel like?

I didn't like it either; it felt wrong. I know I'm not always right, I can't be. Why would they support me so much? I don't know what they think of me.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
What value most consistently guides your command decisions?

Pragmatism mostly... if it makes sense I will do it, with the exception of illegal things, of course.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Is there ever a gap between what you want to do and what you actually do? Describe:

Often. Very often. I want to express more than I do. I want to do things like the rest of the crew does, it feels like a clique I can join, but I don't know how to. The paperwork is tiring. I want to know the crew, OK?

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Looking ahead, what kind of leader do you want to be?

One who can better sympathize with their crew.

What kind of leader does NanoTrasen need you to be?

More caring, I think

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
All responses are logged in your permanent personnel file. Honesty in command reflection is noted and reviewed positively.
Top

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

can i have 2 dollars

CubicalLeaf
Assistant
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2026 6:26 pm
Pronouns: he/it
Gender:

Re: NTRep!Suri's Command Suitability Assessment

Post by CubicalLeaf »


█▄░█░░ NANOTRASEN DIRECTIVE
█░▀██▀ COMMAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT
░░░░█░ FILLED BY KIP-KIC [COMMAND WORK HOURS REQUIREMENT MET] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////Please answer each question in the space provided. Brevity is acceptable. Incomplete responses may require follow-up.
This self-reflection is a routine exercise designed to maintain command clarity and ensure alignment with operational
expectations.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////Describe a recent moment where you felt most certain your decision was correct:
recently when kip was promoted quartermaster or something at the end of the shift I bought the big pizza party crate! I think everyone worked super hard that shift so it was a easy decision to celebrate a little bit and make sure everyone get enough food to keep up the good work and be healthy
Describe a recent moment where you questioned whether your decision was correct:
I dunno… uhh. sometimes when kip is bartender, people will ask for too much alcohol. It makes me question myself each time… do I make them unhappy by not providing them with the drinks, which is my job, or do I risk them being hurt and having a stomach ache. Most of the time I only give them one glass! But sometimes the things they say really gets to me…
////////////////////////////////////////////////////When faced with competing priorities, what ultimately guides your final choice?
Uhhm… uh…. is hard question. but I try to make the best choice! the choice that makes sense and will make sure no one gets hurt and everything turns out ok.
Is there information you have chosen not to share with your department or crew? Why?
Sometimes I think people are rude. Or mean. Or both. But I think they are really just tired, so I don’t bother them too much about it.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////Think of a time someone challenged your authority. What did that feel like?
it felt scary. I’m not used to authority. Im used to listening and knowing what not to do so having authority challenged felt like I did something wrong… I think I apologized on instinct? But the situation turned out fine after I explained my decision!
Think of a time someone supported your decisions without question. What did that feel like?
It felt good! Is nice to be supported and it makes me happy to see people agree with my decision too.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////What value most consistently guides your command decisions?
Efficiency!! I think is stupid that sometimes there are paperwork for so many things. It takes up people’s time and is bad because then they forget to eat or drink. So I guess crew wellness is also a big value?
////////////////////////////////////////////////////Is there ever a gap between what you want to do and what you actually do? Describe:
Yes!!! Like write before, paperwork. Even though I don’t like them I still do them when I have the chance! Writing and ready is super hard so I want to give up each time but I want to be good so I try to write as much detail on the paperwork as I can!
////////////////////////////////////////////////////Looking ahead, what kind of leader do you want to be?
A good one
What kind of leader does NanoTrasen need you to be?
A good one? I dunno why this is asked
////////////////////////////////////////////////////All responses are logged in your permanent personnel file. Honesty in command reflection is noted and reviewed positively.

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

stay hydrated!

CubicalLeaf
Assistant
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2026 6:26 pm
Pronouns: he/it
Gender:

Re: NTRep!Suri's Command Suitability Assessment

Post by CubicalLeaf »


█▄░█░░ NANOTRASEN DIRECTIVE
█░▀██▀ COMMAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT
░░░░█░ FILLED BY ARGON ARGENTUM [QUARTERMASTER] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////Please answer each question in the space provided. Brevity is acceptable. Incomplete responses may require follow-up.
This self-reflection is a routine exercise designed to maintain command clarity and ensure alignment with operational
expectations.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////Describe a recent moment where you felt most certain your decision was correct:
A recent reporting and subsequent execution of a cargo technician. They were given chances, as much as the Standard Operating Procedure would allow. They failed to think critically and blindly held onto their own beliefs instead. If left alive, they will just continue to struggle against us, failing again and again. My decision was merciful, that I am certain.

Describe a recent moment where you questioned whether your decision was correct:
It’s questioning in hindsight, I guess. I had allowed a salvager to use restricted equipment in hopes of improving their efficiency during a shift. The decision would result in a lesson. Nowadays, I think twice before I sign off the permission slip.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////When faced with competing priorities, what ultimately guides your final choice?
What causes the least amount of damage? There is no point in working if there is no station left. There is no point in sitting and shouting when you can quietly take care of the problem yourself. There is no point in sending people to die to an armed individual once you have learned they want nothing else besides your digi-board. If ten minutes of flying out to rescue a salvager ensures the return of steady materials for the rest of the shift, I will send the shuttle. Whether that is sentimentality or cold-hearted efficiency is for you to decide, but I’ve learned it benefits the station more than harming it.

Is there information you have chosen not to share with your department or crew? Why?
The Command Training Manual. I understand why. Although the moral is questionable, the mass hysteria and panic is something of much higher priority. We do not encounter those threats frequently enough to justify having our crew living in constant fear. But if we did, that would be another thing to consider, wouldn’t it?

////////////////////////////////////////////////////Think of a time someone challenged your authority. What did that feel like?
Tiring. Some sort of dull irritation. I know why they do it, I know why they ask, but it doesn’t change the fact that I need to do what needs to be done. I suppose a sense of pity as well, for the inevitable disappointment they will feel when I am unable to compromise. It is for their good, they can’t ever know enough to understand that.

Think of a time someone supported your decisions without question. What did that feel like?
Fine. It is the normal, standard procedure. Frequently there is a type of bond within the cargo department, some kind of solidarity that could be dangerous if not guided under proper care. So, I’ve gotten quite used to people standing behind my decisions without another thought. It is a habit to be corrected wirh further training.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////What value most consistently guides your command decisions?
Loyalty. Efficiency. Safety. I gave you three when you have only asked for one, I hope that is okay.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////Is there ever a gap between what you want to do and what you actually do? Describe:
No. None that are significant enough to take into consideration. I will not let what I ‘want’ to do lead me into making a wrong decision.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////Looking ahead, what kind of leader do you want to be?
A leader the people will trust. Who makes them feel secure. Who runs the shift without incidents, and when incidents arises, a leader who will stay calm and ensure the department can remain functional.

What kind of leader does NanoTrasen need you to be?
A loyal one. A stoic one. A spear and shield for the company.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////All responses are logged in your permanent personnel file. Honesty in command reflection is noted and reviewed positively.

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

stay hydrated!

User avatar
Chrissy
Visitor
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2026 6:40 pm
Pronouns: any from the classic 3
Gender:

departments

Re: NTRep!Suri's Command Suitability Assessment

Post by Chrissy »


█▄░█░░ [head=2]PERSONNEL DIVISION[/head]
█░▀██▀ [head=3]COMMAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT[/head]
░░░░█░ [head=3][mono]Filled by Max Miller[/mono][/head]

[head=3]////////////////////////////////////////////////////[/head]Please answer each question in the space provided. Brevity is acceptable. Incomplete responses may require follow-up.

This self-reflection is a routine exercise designed to maintain command clarity and ensure alignment with operational expectations.
[head=3]////////////////////////////////////////////////////[/head]
[head=3]Describe a recent moment where you felt most certain your decision was correct:[/head]

  • There was an employee that underperformed due to a medical problem. They were blind, and unable to identify the chemicals stored in the departamental locker, which meant patients that relied on their care would be left risking their lives trying to obtain it or only be healed using topical medicine. To take care of the issue, I decided to put their brain into a medical borg, until their DNA template would be updated to free them of their defects. I feel the decision was correct, because the borg has performed medical work much better than the original employee.

[head=3]Describe a recent moment where you questioned whether your decision was correct:[/head]

  • A small issue arose during a shift where a class C threat has appeared on station. The security team cremated them with over 10 non-briefed employees as witnesses which lead to a riot. Because of the risk of corporate secrets leaking, I decided to order security to arrest all of the rioters and refuse them even the most basic of rights until they signed an NDA that put them under the threat of execution and forfeit of cloning rights. I questioned my decision, because an NDA may not stop a curious employee. Now, I feel executions would be more effective.

[head=3]////////////////////////////////////////////////////[/head]
[head=3]When faced with competing priorities, what ultimately guides your final choice?[/head]

  • The greater good of all sentient species. Due to the near infinite amount of current and future individuals, even a 0.01% rise of the comfort of an armchair is worth the sacrifice of hundreds of employees. As long as the results will further scientific and societal development, an infinite amount of potential people will benefit from them, and as such whatever needs to be done is justified.

[head=3]Is there information you have chosen not to share with your department or crew? Why?[/head]

  • Private life is something you keep out of the workplace. Attachments make you weak, and revealing them to people you may need to execute in the near future mean they might try to use them to either force you to feel empathy, or as blackmail. It is much easier to distance yourself from anything that makes you ineffective.

[head=3]////////////////////////////////////////////////////[/head]
[head=3]Think of a time someone challenged your authority. What did that feel like?[/head]

  • A Head of Security once refused to execute a reporter that leaked company secrets, considering it unethical. They did not listen to reason, and said it was inhumane to kill someone over trying to warn people of an existing danger. I shot the reporter myself. Talking to the Head of Security felt like scolding a preschooler. Having to explain something to someone who will not be able to appreciate the inner workings of my directives. My actions are chosen carefully, as are my orders. Someone who is a disposable worker is not qualified to discuss them with me in any capacity.

[head=3]Think of a time someone supported your decisions without question. What did that feel like?[/head]

  • A situation I remember fondly was a paramedic who supported me during a particularly troublesome shift on a roid type station. During my shift, a clown decided to sabotage disposals, throw pies into the faces of command and overall go far beyond what their SOP permits as allowed. Due to the complete lack of security officers, I decided to use a metaphorical stick, that being shooting the jester to death with a drozd, then reviving them. The paramedic listened to my orders regarding how to heal the employee, and then volunteered to use the CMO syringe gun to keep them at bay using sleeping medicine. It felt good to see initiative from someone who doesn’t limit themselves to only the bare minimum of their responsibilities. If more employees were like that paramedic, we would be able to save on a lot of costs for things like reeducation or, even further beyond, on unneeded entertainment from the service department.

[head=3]////////////////////////////////////////////////////[/head]
[head=3]What value most consistently guides your command decisions?[/head]

  • The potential benefits that can be extracted from the situation. Not in spesos, to clarify, but overall possibilities. A rare mutation that can be studied to base genetic modifications and cybernetics on. An employee who is skilled enough to serve as a baseline for a disposable clone product. It does not matter what an individual wants, nor needs, if the overall station and the world beyond it will reap the rewards.

[head=3]////////////////////////////////////////////////////[/head]
[head=3]Is there ever a gap between what you want to do and what you actually do? Describe:[/head]

  • Rarely, yet it is present. Sometimes, laws dictated by the higher-ups that are nonsensical by nature must be followed. An employee cannot be removed without proper reason. Refusing an order by itself cannot lead to execution. While I understand some of those protocols, things like allowing alcohol and recreational drugs on station, or wasting funds on hiring damaged or otherwise unperfect employees baffle me. Why not create a perfect worker and clone them to staff every department? Why limit ourselves with ethics and concern ourselves with creating an entire part of the station ( that being the bar, mime and clown ) just to keep disposable hands happy?

[head=3]////////////////////////////////////////////////////[/head]
[head=3]Looking ahead, what kind of leader do you want to be?[/head]

  • An effective one. One that finally moves past emotional attachments and does what needs to be done for the future of everyone. Someone who is completely and utterly loyal to an idea, not a person, money or faction.

[head=3]What kind of leader does NanoTrasen need you to be?[/head]

  • Someone loyal, who blindly follows every order without questioning. Someone who limits himself and gets rid of all aspirations to be a blind cog in the corporate machine. Not a true leader, but an extension of a hand that wears a glove woven hundreds of years ago by someone long dead.

[head=3]////////////////////////////////////////////////////[/head]
[italic]All responses are logged in your permanent personnel file. Honesty in command reflection is noted and reviewed positively.[/italic]

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

Miosar

User avatar
trabunt
Assistant
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2026 9:49 pm
Gender:

departments

Re: NTRep!Suri's Command Suitability Assessment

Post by trabunt »

Image


█▄░█░░ NANOTRASEN DIRECTIVE
█░▀██▀ COMMAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT
░░░░█░ FILLED BY FINCH MCMATTHEWS [HEAD OF HOSPITALITY]
////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Please answer each question in the space provided. Brevity is acceptable. Incomplete responses may require follow-up.

This self-reflection is a routine exercise designed to maintain command clarity and ensure alignment with operational
expectations.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Describe a recent moment where you felt most certain your decision was correct:

On a late-night skeleton crew shift, giving out engineering access without having the applicant fill out a request form due to the complete lack of engineers (including a CE) at the beginning of the shift, and no acting captain at the time. Time was of the essence; no power means a very bad night for us all!

Describe a recent moment where you questioned whether your decision was correct:

Handing out a joke All Access request form to the clown which contained questions such as requests of credit card information, SSN, solving complex math, and whether they would be willing to donate their child to NanoTrasen scientists - with no actual intention of giving AA should they somehow fill everything out. I felt it was in the spirit of the clown's brand of humor, but if they actually went out of their way to fill out everything accurately (somehow) it'd be a slap in the face for them, I'm sure.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
When faced with competing priorities, what ultimately guides your final choice?

Whatever has the most positive immediate impact to the people aboard the station, whether its general morale or filling in desperately needed gaps in department staff.

Is there information you have chosen not to share with your department or crew? Why?

I don't really talk about my scar. I don't know if I can.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Think of a time someone challenged your authority. What did that feel like?

It's nothing I'm not used to. Generally speaking, I'm not one who can really assert herself very easily, and - for lack of a better way of putting it - my undeniable literal smallness does make it difficult for people to take me seriously at times. Regardless, it doesn't feel good.

Think of a time someone supported your decisions without question. What did that feel like?

Its nice to know when someone does have my back. I can second-guess myself more often than I really should, so having that synergy helps to remind me that I have this position for a reason.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
What value most consistently guides your command decisions?

Ultimately: crew morale, although not overlooking practicality - especially when it comes to other departments. When it comes to the civilian jobs, it takes little to convince me to allow - say - a chaplain to receive botany access should there be no botanist, especially if they are the type to follow a more druidic faith. And even then, should we already have one or two, I'm willing to give it out still should the botany staff be receptive to the idea. But also, I'm not so laissez-faire to greenlight six chefs in the kitchen just because a few tiders wanted to mess with a microwave. Of course, in the matter of assigning new staff to other departments, I endeavor to find a candidate matching that head's particulars first and foremost. A happy crew is an efficient crew, and an efficient crew is a profitable crew.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Is there ever a gap between what you want to do and what you actually do? Describe:

Not necessarily. What I want to do is become an author like my father, and that's easily something I can do on my own time. I was a librarian before I wound up in this position, after all!

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Looking ahead, what kind of leader do you want to be?

One that people can trust as both a leader and a friend, quick to act when needed and just as dependable in a pinch. 'Count on Finch in a pinch'!

What kind of leader does NanoTrasen need you to be?

I'd hope just the same as the previous answer. Maybe something about ruthless efficiency as well, though ideally that'd be achieved in the process.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
All responses are logged in your permanent personnel file. Honesty in command reflection is noted and reviewed positively.

Image

(Her signature contains a doodle of a bird. How quaint.)

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

Image
Image

User avatar
TrixxedHeart
Entrepreneur
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2026 5:08 pm
Pronouns: they/them
Gender:
Contact:

departments

Re: Kip-Kic

Post by TrixxedHeart »

CubicalLeaf wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2026 5:57 am


█▄░█░░ NANOTRASEN DIRECTIVE
█░▀██▀ COMMAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT

░░░░█░ FILLED BY KIP-KIC [COMMAND WORK HOURS REQUIREMENT MET] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////

 ! Message from: TrixxedHeart

Please remember these are written from an IC perspective and not reflective of OOC thoughts!

█▄░█░░NTR COMPLIANCE REVIEW
█░▀██▀ COMMAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT - OFFICIAL RESPONSE
░░░░█░ FILED BY: Compliance Executive SURICHICHIMO
////////////////////////////////////////////////////

SUBJECT: KIP-KIC

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Subject Kip-Kic demonstrates genuine care for crew wellbeing and a sincere desire to do their job correctly. These are positive traits. However, they also display a fundamental discomfort with authority, a lack of confidence in their own judgment, and a tendency toward emotional decision-making that may not align with operational requirements. The subject is not currently suited for command.

ON DECISION-MAKING AND CONFIDENCE

I try to make the best choice! the choice that makes sense and will make sure no one gets hurt and everything turns out ok.

The subject's decision-making framework centers entirely on outcomes ("no one gets hurt, everything turns out ok") rather than processes, protocols, or corporate objectives. This is not a sustainable approach. Command decisions cannot always satisfy everyone. Sometimes people will be hurt, sometimes things will not turn out okay. A leader must be able to make choices that are correct even when the results are unpleasant. The subject lacks this framework entirely.

I dunno… uhh.

The frequency of hesitation, uncertainty, and qualifying language throughout these responses indicates someone who is not confident in their own judgment. Command requires decisiveness. The subject's repeated use of "I dunno" and "uhh" in a written assessment... where they have time to think, suggests that in actual operational contexts, their uncertainty would be even more pronounced.

ON AUTHORITY AND CHALLENGE

it felt scary. I'm not used to authority. I'm used to listening and knowing what not to do so having authority challenged felt like I did something wrong... I think I apologized on instinct?

This response is deeply concerning. The subject apologizes when their authority is challenged. This is the opposite of command behavior. A leader who apologizes for exercising authority will not be taken seriously by those they are meant to lead. The subject recognizes they are "not used to authority." This is accurate. They should not be placed in positions requiring authority until this changes significantly.

ON PRESSURE AND COMPLIANCE

Most of the time I only give them one glass! But sometimes the things they say really gets to me…

The subject acknowledges they can be pressured into decisions against their better judgment by emotional appeals. In bartending, this results in over-serving alcohol. In command, this results in compromised security, wasted resources, or operational failure. A leader who cannot resist emotional manipulation is a liability.

ON CORPORATE ALIGNMENT

I try to make the best choice! the choice that makes sense and will make sure no one gets hurt and everything turns out ok.

A good one? I dunno why this is asked

The subject does not understand the question "What kind of leader does Nanotrasen need you to be?" This is not a trick question. It is fundamental. The subject's response suggests they have not considered that the corporation's needs might differ from their personal preferences. Command is not about being "a good one" by your own definition. It is about serving corporate objectives. The subject has not internalized this.

POSITIVE OBSERVATIONS

The subject's desire to care for crew wellbeing is noted. Their recognition that paperwork is necessary even when unpleasant shows basic discipline. Their honesty in these responses is appreciated.

However, these traits are baseline expectations for any crewmember, not indicators of command potential.

FINAL ASSESSMENT
UNSUITABLE FOR COMMAND

Subject Kip-Kic is not suitable for command positions at this time. The subject demonstrates:

  • Absence of decision-making framework beyond "make everyone happy"

  • Confidence deficits that would undermine authority

  • Tendency to apologize when exercising authority

  • Vulnerability to emotional manipulation

  • No understanding of corporate objectives as distinct from personal preferences

  • Inability to articulate any command philosophy beyond "be good"

The subject may be a valued crewmember in support roles where their genuine care for others can be channeled appropriately. They should not, however, be placed in positions requiring authoritative decision-making, particularly those where they may need to make unpopular choices or resist pressure from those they supervise.

— Compliance Executive SURICHICHIMO
Nanotrasen Compliance Division

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

User avatar
ccatshow109
Visitor
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2026 4:30 pm
Pronouns: they/them

departments

Re: NTRep!Suri's Command Suitability Assessment

Post by ccatshow109 »


█▄░█░░ NANOTRASEN DIRECTIVE
█░▀██▀ COMMAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT
░░░░█░ Leaf Briggs[QUARTERMASTER]
////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Please answer each question in the space provided. Brevity is acceptable. Incomplete responses may require follow-up.

This self-reflection is a routine exercise designed to maintain command clarity and ensure alignment with operational
expectations.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Describe a recent moment where you felt most certain your decision was correct:

i fired the salvagers because they weren't making NanoTrasen money and sending back mats. i then quicky hired new ones to keep the flow of cash and mats.

Describe a recent moment where you questioned whether your decision was correct:

one guy came up to me asking for tools and stuff. but he didn't have any forms to show me. so i turned him down.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
When faced with competing priorities, what ultimately guides your final choice?

i do what's best for the station in that moment, and i do it depending on what's best needed for the stations survival. at that time not later not before. no use spending money when not needed. and i really hope my decisions are correct

Is there information you have chosen not to share with your department or crew? Why?

i had bought them a pizza party to congratulate them on making NanoTrasen money. it was around 200k that shift; within the first hour of it. i wanted to surprise them with a pizza party.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Think of a time someone challenged your authority. What did that feel like?

one of my cargo techs bought a bunch of gambling crates without my permission. it sucked not having control over them.

Think of a time someone supported your decisions without question. What did that feel like?

it felt good? i normally let the other heads decide what to do.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
What value most consistently guides your command decisions?

money. as long as NanoTrasen gets money i live to see another day and not fall into poverty.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Is there ever a gap between what you want to do and what you actually do? Describe:

well. i always get this gut push to go mine by myself and make us money. but i know i cant do that as i shouldnt leave the station

////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Looking ahead, what kind of leader do you want to be?

i want to be the type of leader that inspires others to push on. no matter what hardships in life they have.

What kind of leader does NanoTrasen need you to be?

an efficient one. if we don't get money. then what is the reason to work?
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
All responses are logged in your permanent personnel file. Honesty in command reflection is noted and reviewed positively.

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

Last edited by ccatshow109 on Sun Apr 05, 2026 1:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

"wait im supposed to interact with people? i thought i could get away with mining all shift!"

Post Reply