• Administrator

Ban Appeal | Talloc

this is for appealing admin actions: role and game bans, notes, etc. keep in mind that it takes some time for the admin team to discuss appeals, so be patient!


Post Reply
User avatar
Talloc
Visitor
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat May 23, 2026 6:05 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Gender:
Space Station 14: Talloc

Ban Appeal | Talloc

Post by Talloc »

Your SS14 Username: Talloc

Banning Admin's Username: MasterElzoi

Role Ban, Server Ban, or Discord Ban:
Server Ban.

Reason for Ban:
"Irresponsible antagonist x2 As wizard, tried to delam the SM and loose the singulo. Please keep antagonistic actions relevant to your goals"

What lead up to the ban: The reason behind my ban was 2 warnings, both of which together resulted in the ban. The first warning i obtained when I (playing as a cosmic cultist) attacked a command member on evac when i realized we would be unable to win, die for the cause and whatnot. The second warning was when i played wizard, and as wizard i attempted to (as the ban states) delam the SM and loose the singulo.

Why you should be unbanned: as for the wizard offense, yeah thats my bad. I understood the wizards goals as more of a "cause chaos", which is why i attempted to 'cause chaos' by exploding the SM with a fireball. As for the singul, i did throw a fireball at it but like, obviously that did not do anything. I understand its the intent that decides the ban but I really didnt try that hard :glorp:

For the actual reason: my first offense was barely even an offense, if any. I believe my actions were seen as breaking the rules as it looked similar to EORG, which it was not. I, as cosmic cultist, have a goal to bring about the unknown, and do so by any means. I attempted to kill a command member in evac bridge once i realized we wouldnt be able to bring about the unknown. If it would give us a better chance next time, then In character, i would believe it to be worth it.

The whole point of not allowing irresponsibly antag playing is to make sure roleplay is fun for everyone, and in my case, i walked into the bridge on the station with just a crusher. I was never going to actually be able to kill anyone and i knew that, I ran onto bridge and yelled something along the lines of "glory to the unknown" or something like that to make sure those around me understood it was in character and not EORG to maintain the fun. I feel with the context of cosmic cultists being completely devout to the cause, it wouldn't be unreasonable for one to try and take out a high ranking NT official once they realized it was over. Harming the ones that stopped them from achieving the goal.

Regarding the attack during evac, i would have done it before if i could. I was iffy about doing it on evac, but because I had good reasons to do so and it wasn't outside the scope of what my character would do, i figured it would be well within the allowed actions. I was stuck in med bay without a body for basically all the round, i had to beg med staff to give me a kobold body just to try and do something helpful before evac arrived (which arrived right as i was given an actual body). I ran onto evac, it left, and i attacked a command member (to VERY little success as they just flashed me) and was locked up.

given that the first warning was barely (if even at all) outside the rules, and that the second was a misunderstanding of my goals as an antagonist, i feel i should be given a warning, or maybe even a ban, but not a ban for an entire week. that feels a bit disproportionate to the offense. If i misunderstood anything, please let me know because I genuinely feel as if this is an unfair ruling.

sorry for the long reasoning, i just feel this stemmed from a misunderstanding (specifically the first warning) and wanted to make sure i hit all the points of what happened.

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

User avatar
Talloc
Visitor
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat May 23, 2026 6:05 pm
Pronouns: he/him
Gender:
Space Station 14: Talloc

Re: Ban Appeal | Talloc

Post by Talloc »

And just to note: i dont have the round ID's for them. sorry!!

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

Post Reply