• Administrator
  •  

    FORUM IS OUT!!!!

    If you are having trouble with embeds, please change your links to use forum.funkystation.org instead of the old URL.

     

On the security NDA

need a rules clarification, or have a question for the admin team? ask here!


Post Reply
User avatar
catshark
Assistant
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2026 6:37 pm
Pronouns: she/they
Gender:

On the security NDA

Post by catshark »

Recently, I have been playing some HoS.

I've been told, when attempting to brief my officers about metashielded threats (e.g.: Heretics.) I am often told this is covered by the security NDA.

However, I have been told by an NTR player that it is not and requires a separate one.

Who is right? Did something get updated recently-ish or are people just wrong?

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

UESCTerm 802.11 (remote override)

Existence is simple: find the food, push the button, hit the treadmill.

User avatar
Salpphie
Head Admin
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2026 5:21 am
Pronouns: they/them

departments

Re: On the security NDA

Post by Salpphie »

TLDR; the NTR was incorrect, and all starting security members have an NDA that just applies to anything they're later informed on.

For the sake of gameplay and being able to address threats promptly, all STARTING security officers are assumed to, like starting Command, be under an NDA. (Security members who join later will need to be given an NDA.)

SEC's NDA does not require them to be given another one to sign even when told about threats in the command guidebook (changeling, heretic, cult, etc.). It is just assumed due to their current NDA that anything the HOS or other command gives them information-wise is protected under that NDA.

So, for example, if SEC is briefed on changelings, they do not need an NDA to sign. NTR should not be forcing this as well, as it is already assumed you are under NDA.

 

POSTREACT(ions) SUMMARY

Image Funky Station HeadminImage

Post Reply